Opposing Sexual Abuse of Children is the New Hate

0
108

Assessment: When sentencing one pedophile, Jackson claimed that his crimes which included possession of a video of a  “pre-pubescent boy being penetrated anally and orally”, were not “particularly egregious”.

After four days spent falsely accusing Justice Kavanaugh of sexual assault in high school, the Senate finally encountered a Supreme Court nominee with a horrifying sexual abuse record.

And we weren’t allowed to talk about it.

There is no way to know how many children had their lives ruined and their innocence stolen because Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson insisted on going easy on child pornography traffickers.

 And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold.” Matthew 24:12

When Republicans tried to bring up Jackson’s horrifying actions, the media shouted them down.

The Los Angeles Times called Republicans asking Jackson basic questions about why Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson refused to lock up pedophiles “sickening”, Vanity Fair called it “vile”, and Vox denounced it as “grotesque”.

Do you know what’s truly sickening, vile and grotesque?

When sentencing one pedophile, Jackson claimed that his crimes which included possession of a video of a  “pre-pubescent boy being penetrated anally and orally”, were not “particularly egregious”.

Read More @ Front Page Mag HERE